5 Feb
2007
5 Feb
'07
11:13 a.m.
On Feb 3, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Douglas Philips wrote:
Well, if we're going to bring personal points of view in, it highly pisses me off that in a construct such as: ( expr , expr , expr , expr , expr , ) I have to be vigilant to remove that trailing comma when it is in _no way_ ambiguous.
How about instead writing ( expr , expr , expr , expr , expr ) The only extra work is when inserting an element at the beginning, but you have the same problem in your example. / Ulf