Re: map and fmap

Indeed, I agree. On 30/08/06, Ashley Yakeley wrote:

Cale Gibbard wrote:

...

While we're at it, let's split MonadZero and MonadPlus -- the decision to merge them was not well thought-out, and a lot of expressive power in type signatures is lost there.

This should be split into three classes, "MonadZero", "MonadPlus" and "MonadOr" owing to variations in instances of the current MonadPlus.

See: http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/MonadPlus http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/MonadPlus_reform_proposal

-- Ashley Yakeley Seattle WA

_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime