23 Feb
2006
23 Feb
'06
1:34 p.m.
Hello John, Thursday, February 23, 2006, 4:07:52 PM, you wrote: JM> That is the plan. none of the current Array implementations will JM> change, they will still be instances of both MArray and HasBounds. it is JM> just that HasBounds will no longer be a superclass of MArray, however JM> that doesn't affect performance in any appreciable way. our plans are equal :) JM> (and array JM> operations pretty much always end up specialized anyway so all class JM> overhead disapears.) this depends. IArray/MArray interfaces currently contains only a few operations and all other implemented in fixed manner, so you can't omit any overheads -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com