6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
10:33 a.m.
What semantics would you like Haskell to have, in which (x `seq` y `seq` e) and (y `seq` x `seq` e) are not equal?
I can easily imagine that (x `seq` y `seq` e) might have *two* semantic denotations: bottom (Exception: stack overflow), and e. And I would like to be able to choose which one I get (please). This is the declared purpose of seq, namely "to improve performance by avoiding unneeded laziness". Regards, Malcolm