Hello Niklas, Thursday, April 24, 2008, 12:42:02 AM, you wrote:
But then I started questioning my own motives. What changes would that be? Changing a . to a $ if I decided to remove the previous last piece of the "pipeline"? Doesn't seem too hairy, and I have to do far worse than that already when refactoring.
it's not refactoring! it's just adding more features - exception handler, progress indicator, memory pool and so on. actually, code blocks used as a sort of RAII for Haskell. are you wanna change all those ';' when you add new variable to your C++ code? bracketCtrlBreak (archiveReadFooter command arcname) (archiveClose.fst) $ \(archive,footer) -> do bad_crcs <- withList $ \bad_crcs -> do doChunks arcsize sector_size $ \bytes -> do uiWithProgressIndicator command arcsize $ do or handleCtrlBreak (ignoreErrors$ fileRemove arcname_fixed) $ do bracketCtrlBreak (archiveCreateRW arcname_fixed) (archiveClose) $ \new_archive -> do withJIT (fileOpen =<< originalURL originalName arcname) fileClose $ \original' -> do is just two examples from my code -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com