it's not refactoring! it's just adding more features - exception handler, progress indicator, memory pool and so on. actually, code blocks used as a sort of RAII for Haskell. are you wanna change all those ';' when you add new variable to your C++ code?
bracketCtrlBreak (archiveReadFooter command arcname) (archiveClose.fst) $ \(archive,footer) -> do bad_crcs <- withList $ \bad_crcs -> do doChunks arcsize sector_size $ \bytes -> do uiWithProgressIndicator command arcsize $ do or handleCtrlBreak (ignoreErrors$ fileRemove arcname_fixed) $ do bracketCtrlBreak (archiveCreateRW arcname_fixed) (archiveClose) $ \new_archive -> do withJIT (fileOpen =<< originalURL originalName arcname) fileClose $ \original' -> do
is just two examples from my code
... and neither of those examples would be broken by changing the associativity of $. If that kind of code had been broken, I would have complained too. So what was your point again? ;-) Cheers, /Niklas