Hello,
I would say that this is a too complex of a change to discuss for Haskell
Prime without implementation or prior experience. If you are interested
in something like this, you may want to start a discussion of the design on
one of the other lists, or perhaps write up a proposal for GHC.
The proposals currently under discussion are on the `github` URL.
Cheers,
-Iavor
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Saurabh Nanda
Hi Everyone,
I was going through https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Process#Proposals and noticed the following:
Ideally the language change should be implemented already, so that experience gained with the implementation can inform the discussion
Is this a hard requirement? I would like to see the ability to pass named arguments to functions somehow (most probably through anonymous records). I'm unaware of any existing language extension that solves this problem. Does this render the discussion out-of-bounds from a Haskell Prime perspective? Has this already been proposed and considered?
Also, going by what is given on the Wiki, I'm confused about where to check the current status of proposals that are being considered. Which is the primary link:
* https://prime.haskell.org/query?status=new&status= assigned&status=reopened&group=state * Or, https://github.com/haskell/rfcs
-- Saurabh.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime