5 Apr
2006
5 Apr
'06
7:51 p.m.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:34:09AM -0500, Spencer Janssen wrote:
How about an implementation that sets the deepSeq'd bit *after* each field has been successfully deepSeq'd? deepSeq'ing a cyclic structure would behave just like an infinite structure.
what would be the point of having a bit then? in any case, we should talk about the meaning of deepseqing something, not its implementation. depth limited recursive seq seems like the best route to me. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈