On 08/02/10 23:04, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:24:55PM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
What would be the actual change proposed? If it is something concrete and not something like "negatives should be interpreted as unary minus when otherwise it would lead to a parse error" then that wouldn't be good. I have enough issues with the layout rule as is :)
I imagine it would be something like deleting the production
lexp6 -> - exp7
and adding the production
exp10 -> - fexp
Remember that Haskell 2010 changed things here, so that production no longer exists: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/FixityResolution the equivalent change can be made in the new formulation, of course, and would probably simplify it. Cheers, Simon