Re: do-and-if-then-else modification

19 Feb 2007


      On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:16:03AM +0000, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
...
And it now occurs to me that perhaps something different was
intended.  The following is legal H'98:
case whatever of
    Cons -> bluh
    Nil  -> foo
But stick it in a do block and it ceases to be accepted:
do case whatever of
       Cons -> bluh
       Nil  -> foo
No, that's a separate issue: NondecreasingIndentation.

Re: do-and-if-then-else modification

Ross Paterson