2 Feb
2006
2 Feb
'06
7:39 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:19:43PM -0600, Taral wrote:
Got a unicode-compliant compiler?
sure do :) but it currently doesn't recognize any unicode characters as possible operators. which it should, but I am just not sure how to specify that yet until some sort of standard develops. Once there are more unicode compliant compilers out there something will evolve probably. Right now I am thinking of being able to add a PRAGMA to force some characters to be interpreted as operators just so that they can start being used now, even though there isn't a standard set you can count on yet. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈