
31 Jan
2006
31 Jan
'06
12:23 p.m.
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
All that said, I think not being able to give a name to a context is a real weakness in Haskell. It's one of the few things that cannot be named, and being able to do so would help refactoring and modularity.
definitely. Currently we have to simulate that by class ( C1 , C2 , ... ) => Context instance ( C1, C2 , .. ) => Context (is it equivalent? I hope so) but it is awkward to duplicate information like that. best regards, -- -- Johannes Waldmann -- Tel/Fax (0341) 3076 6479/80 -- ---- http://www.imn.htwk-leipzig.de/~waldmann/ -------