My main concern is its a really weird corner case for the grammar to
remember for tuple sections and it does have very weird grammar
specification issues.
I really have no objection to it for the other cases. It'd make export
lists cleaner, maybe a few other cases, but how often can you really say
you can meaningfully comment out one field of a tuple have have the
surrounding code make any sense?
-Edward
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Bardur Arantsson
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Garrett Mitchener < garrett.mitchener@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyway, this is a "paper cut" in the language that has been bugging me for a while, and since there's now a call for suggestions for Haskell 2014, I thought I'd ask about it.
I've also thought about this issue and I agree with Garrett, allowing
On 05/17/2013 06:32 PM, Johan Tibell wrote: that
trailing comma (or semicolon) would help readability*. If it doesn't work with tuples, perhaps we could at least do it with lists and records?
Multiline tuples don't seem all that common, so +1 on that from me.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime