13 Jul
2009
13 Jul
'09
5 p.m.
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 12/07/2009 22:32, haskell@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
Should the consistency with operator section also be added as 'cons' to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/QualifiedOperators ?
So correct me if I'm wrong; the point you're making is:
left section right section prefix unqualified (+ 1) (1 +) (+) Haskell 98 (M.+ 1) (1 M.+) (M.+) proposed (`M.(+)` 1) (1 `M.(+)`) M.(+) or(*) (M.(+) 1) (flip M.(+) 1)
(*) only if precedence isn't important, e.g. not in cases like (`M.(+)` x `M.(*)` y).
Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for working it out!