16 May
2006
16 May
'06
8:51 p.m.
On 2006-05-15, Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Aaron,
Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:27:43 AM, you wrote:
IMHO the right thing is to decouple finalising an FD/AT appendix from finalising the main body of Haskell'. This is clearly more easily realised when the delayed material is out-of-line.
Meh. I'd really like a revised numeric prelude to be able to use MPTCs with FDs.
other well-known uses of FDs are also in the heart of core Haskell libs - collections, monad transformers, streams
Sure, it's just I question how core those are. The math stuff pretty much needs to be built in, especially considering things like defaulting, and syntactic sugar. -- Aaron Denney -><-