Re: [Haskell-cafe] Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

...

...

...

...

Henrik Nilsson writes:

So before breaking anything more, that being code, research papers, books, what people have learned, or even the community itself, it is time to very carefully think about what the appropriate processes should be for going forward.

Hi Henrik, I'd really like to understand your position better, since I'm pretty sure it's not just a juxtaposition between "change" or "no change". How would you like to see Haskell grow in the future? What does a successful process to evolve the language look like to you? Is it the change causing you difficulty, or the way we arrive at the change? John