Re: Proposition: accessory functions which are local to type.

Hello Evgenij,

the TDNR proposal seems related to yours:

http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-

It looks my proposal is almost a duplicate of TNDR. If I understand correctly, TNDR still uses a global function scope with some sort of Ad-Hoc, while I suggested that you can create a function which scope is local to a specified type, meaning - function is in scope only if "someLeftHandExpressionReturnsNeededType.access" The name "access" is completely free for a global scope decalaration and it is localy defined in cassess if there is a correct type on left side. prime/wiki/TypeDirectedNameResolut

ion

It would be useful to highlight and motivate the differences to help others judge your proposal.

Cheers, Sebastian