
Hi Prime, Is there a chair of this committee? Herbert has been acting as such (thank you!) but doesn't list himself as the chair in the initial announcement. I am **in no way** trying to change any status quo and am **not** interested in being chair at the moment, but I just wanted to clarify. The specific reason I ask is that Takenobu Tani recently asked about `pseq`. I have no intelligent response to offer, but would want to make sure that someone does offer a response. If there is a chair, that person is de facto responsible that we, as a committee, communicate well, both internally and externally. Thanks, Richard

Hello *, On 2016-04-29 at 15:17:43 +0200, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
Is there a chair of this committee? Herbert has been acting as such (thank you!) but doesn't list himself as the chair in the initial announcement.
I am **in no way** trying to change any status quo and am **not** interested in being chair at the moment, but I just wanted to clarify.
Fwiw, I mentioned in the preceding CfN (https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/2015-September/003936.html) that | In consultation with the current members of the Haskell Prime | committee (and Simon PJ), I have volunteered as chair to "reboot" the | process and get things rolling again. But you're right I failed to repeat this in the actual announcement. However, I don't want to impose myself on the committee as chair. So if anyone else feels motivated enough to pick up the role as chair with the agreement of the committee I'll happily hand over the chair position! :-) Moreover, this doesn't need to be a static configuration: We could also rotate the chair position (and other duties) over the lifetime of the Haskell 2020 committee. There just needs to be one designated chair at any time to keep things moving.
The specific reason I ask is that Takenobu Tani recently asked about `pseq`. I have no intelligent response to offer, but would want to make sure that someone does offer a response. If there is a chair, that person is de facto responsible that we, as a committee, communicate well, both internally and externally.
You're definitely right. And IMO the chair only needs to step in if nobody else feels compelled to respond within a reasonable time, e.g. a few days -- after all, we all have other duties besides the prime committee :-) -- hvr

Hi.
It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked
to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already
answer was a factor in my decision to try to help. Being the committee
chair is less a position of power, and more a position of
responsibility. I think we can be very happy to have someone who is
willing to do the job, and I absolutely trust hvr to be up to the
task.
If needed, we can revisit the question over time when we have a better
idea how our usual workflow and processes look like, but I don't think
we need to or should have this discussion now.
Cheers,
Andres
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
Hello *,
On 2016-04-29 at 15:17:43 +0200, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
Is there a chair of this committee? Herbert has been acting as such (thank you!) but doesn't list himself as the chair in the initial announcement.
I am **in no way** trying to change any status quo and am **not** interested in being chair at the moment, but I just wanted to clarify.
Fwiw, I mentioned in the preceding CfN (https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/2015-September/003936.html) that
| In consultation with the current members of the Haskell Prime | committee (and Simon PJ), I have volunteered as chair to "reboot" the | process and get things rolling again.
But you're right I failed to repeat this in the actual announcement.
However, I don't want to impose myself on the committee as chair. So if anyone else feels motivated enough to pick up the role as chair with the agreement of the committee I'll happily hand over the chair position! :-)
Moreover, this doesn't need to be a static configuration: We could also rotate the chair position (and other duties) over the lifetime of the Haskell 2020 committee. There just needs to be one designated chair at any time to keep things moving.
The specific reason I ask is that Takenobu Tani recently asked about `pseq`. I have no intelligent response to offer, but would want to make sure that someone does offer a response. If there is a chair, that person is de facto responsible that we, as a committee, communicate well, both internally and externally.
You're definitely right. And IMO the chair only needs to step in if nobody else feels compelled to respond within a reasonable time, e.g. a few days -- after all, we all have other duties besides the prime committee :-)
-- hvr
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Hi all,
It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this. And thanks to Herbert for now having completed the first step of the reboot. Best, /Henrik -- Henrik Nilsson School of Computer Science The University of Nottingham nhn@cs.nott.ac.uk This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

On Saturday, April 30, 2016, Henrik Nilsson
Hi all,
It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this.
I as well, Herbert chairing was a big part of why I thought participating would be a productive and worthwhile experience that would accomplish its stated goals.
And thanks to Herbert for now having completed the first step of the reboot.
Best,
/Henrik
-- Henrik Nilsson School of Computer Science The University of Nottingham nhn@cs.nott.ac.uk
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Henrik Nilsson
writes:
It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this.
I also agree, and offer my thanks to Herbert for being willing to take up this role from the beginning. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:03 PM, John Wiegley
Henrik Nilsson
writes: It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this.
I also agree, and offer my thanks to Herbert for being willing to take up this role from the beginning.
Same here.

Yes, I'm essentially on-board thanks to Herbert, who I know tends to
get shit done, and do it well.
Sorry Herbert - I think you're going to be unanimously voted in this
time, whatever exact details we sort out (like rotating committee
chairs). Perhaps we should let you think about those details and
advise us on them. :)
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:09 PM, José Manuel Calderón Trilla
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:03 PM, John Wiegley
wrote: > Henrik Nilsson
writes: It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this.
I also agree, and offer my thanks to Herbert for being willing to take up this role from the beginning.
Same here. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
-- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/

Excellent. I'm very happy with how this thread has gone. :)
(I didn't mean to imply, by the way, that we were slow to answer the `pseq` question. It's just that as I was about to move the email out of my inbox, I realized that we might all do so, and that would be bad. Yes, a few days' time is quite reasonable before anyone has to step in.)
Richard
On Apr 30, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Austin Seipp
Yes, I'm essentially on-board thanks to Herbert, who I know tends to get shit done, and do it well.
Sorry Herbert - I think you're going to be unanimously voted in this time, whatever exact details we sort out (like rotating committee chairs). Perhaps we should let you think about those details and advise us on them. :)
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:09 PM, José Manuel Calderón Trilla
wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:03 PM, John Wiegley
wrote: >> Henrik Nilsson
writes: It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help.
I agree completely with this.
I also agree, and offer my thanks to Herbert for being willing to take up this role from the beginning.
Same here. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
-- Regards,
Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

Having Herbert as chair was also my understanding, and I'm very happy
for him to chair these discussions.
Nick
On 30 April 2016 at 09:38, Andres Löh
It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was a factor in my decision to try to help. Being the committee chair is less a position of power, and more a position of responsibility. I think we can be very happy to have someone who is willing to do the job, and I absolutely trust hvr to be up to the task.
If needed, we can revisit the question over time when we have a better idea how our usual workflow and processes look like, but I don't think we need to or should have this discussion now.
Cheers, Andres
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
wrote: Hello *,
On 2016-04-29 at 15:17:43 +0200, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
Is there a chair of this committee? Herbert has been acting as such (thank you!) but doesn't list himself as the chair in the initial announcement.
I am **in no way** trying to change any status quo and am **not** interested in being chair at the moment, but I just wanted to clarify.
Fwiw, I mentioned in the preceding CfN (https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/2015-September/003936.html) that
| In consultation with the current members of the Haskell Prime | committee (and Simon PJ), I have volunteered as chair to "reboot" the | process and get things rolling again.
But you're right I failed to repeat this in the actual announcement.
However, I don't want to impose myself on the committee as chair. So if anyone else feels motivated enough to pick up the role as chair with the agreement of the committee I'll happily hand over the chair position! :-)
Moreover, this doesn't need to be a static configuration: We could also rotate the chair position (and other duties) over the lifetime of the Haskell 2020 committee. There just needs to be one designated chair at any time to keep things moving.
The specific reason I ask is that Takenobu Tani recently asked about `pseq`. I have no intelligent response to offer, but would want to make sure that someone does offer a response. If there is a chair, that person is de facto responsible that we, as a committee, communicate well, both internally and externally.
You're definitely right. And IMO the chair only needs to step in if nobody else feels compelled to respond within a reasonable time, e.g. a few days -- after all, we all have other duties besides the prime committee :-)
-- hvr
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

| It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to
| be on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer
| was a factor in my decision to try to help. Being the committee chair
| is less a position of power, and more a position of responsibility. I
| think we can be very happy to have someone who is willing to do the
| job, and I absolutely trust hvr to be up to the task.
Andres says this well. Being chair is a facilitating role, helping discussions make progress, and gently pressing them forward to a conclusion.
I'm very grateful to Herbert for taking it on -- thank you!
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Haskell-prime [mailto:haskell-prime-bounces@haskell.org] On
| Behalf Of Andres Löh
| Sent: 30 April 2016 09:39
| To: Herbert Valerio Riedel

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 10:03:55 +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel
Hello *, : | In consultation with the current members of the Haskell Prime | committee (and Simon PJ), I have volunteered as chair to "reboot" the | process and get things rolling again. :
I think it's great that you want to do this! Regards, Henk-Jan van Tuyl -- Folding@home What if you could share your unused computer power to help find a cure? In just 5 minutes you can join the world's biggest networked computer and get us closer sooner. Watch the video. http://folding.stanford.edu/ http://Van.Tuyl.eu/ http://members.chello.nl/hjgtuyl/tourdemonad.html Haskell programming --
participants (11)
-
Andres Löh
-
Austin Seipp
-
Carter Schonwald
-
Henk-Jan van Tuyl
-
Henrik Nilsson
-
Herbert Valerio Riedel
-
John Wiegley
-
José Manuel Calderón Trilla
-
Nicolas Wu
-
Richard Eisenberg
-
Simon Peyton Jones