Hello Wolfgang, Friday, April 11, 2008, 6:19:26 PM, you wrote:

Would it be possible to change the class name “IsString” to something different? Would it be possible to remove the type alias “String” and let “String” be the class name? Can I add this remark somewhere on the wiki?

this reminds me one idea i've once proposed to discuss: allow to use class names in type signatures with obvious translation to "classic" code: putStr :: String -> IO () means putStr :: (String a) => a -> IO () writing a lot of polymorphic code for Streams lib, i've found this feature very useful - with current standard, type signatures using type classes are very hard to read: -- | Copy `size` bytes from one BlockStream to another copyStream :: (BlockStream h1, BlockStream h2, Integral size) => h1 -> h2 -> size -> IO () -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com