
Hello, I haven't seen anything on this mailing list for a little while, is anything going on? Has the process by which proposals will be submitted and worked out been solidified yet? -- Michael Walker (http://www.barrucadu.co.uk)

Hello Michael,
We were waiting on the GHC team to settle on a proposal process for
their stuff so that we could aim to use a similar process and avoid
fragmentation.
For those who don't know, GHC HQ just announced their new process
here: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/blog/rethinking-proposals and
are finalising it on the github repo here:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals
So pretty soon now we should probably discuss whether we are going to
use the same process, alter their process, or use a different process
altogether. My vote would be to mirror their process as much as
possible.
Cheers,
José
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Michael Walker
Hello,
I haven't seen anything on this mailing list for a little while, is anything going on? Has the process by which proposals will be submitted and worked out been solidified yet?
-- Michael Walker (http://www.barrucadu.co.uk) _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

And for our (GHC) part we are moving slowly, partly because it's the summer; partly because no technology seems really ideal; and also because we've had feedback from only a handful of people, and we're a bit reluctant to commit to something new with so little direct endorsement.
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: Haskell-prime [mailto:haskell-prime-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of José Manuel Calderón Trilla
Sent: 19 July 2016 20:14
To: Michael Walker
Hello,
I haven't seen anything on this mailing list for a little while, is anything going on? Has the process by which proposals will be submitted and worked out been solidified yet?
-- Michael Walker (https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.b arrucadu.co.uk&data=01%7c01%7csimonpj%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cf9b43 1369c1e4152794008d3b008d743%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sda ta=q6VlRYqOBJ0kpIg0u5xZDBuJBTevEOSsQFrMbOL83a8%3d) _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmail.h askell.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fhaskell-prime&data=01%7c01 %7csimonpj%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cf9b431369c1e4152794008d3b008d743 %7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=K9vwkfQXAFoAx6GX7JvE9a%2 fonVlnektwJTVsI%2bV%2bVXg%3d
Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmail.haskell.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fhaskell-prime&data=01%7c01%7csimonpj%40064d.mgd.microsoft.com%7cf9b431369c1e4152794008d3b008d743%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=K9vwkfQXAFoAx6GX7JvE9a%2fonVlnektwJTVsI%2bV%2bVXg%3d

On 19.07.2016 20:08, Michael Walker wrote:
I haven't seen anything on this mailing list for a little while, is anything going on? Has the process by which proposals will be submitted and worked out been solidified yet?
I’m planning to spend some time at ZuriHac this weekend thinking about Haskell’, maybe getting the Report to build, making a few experimental changes. Oh, and talking to people mostly, so if you’re around... :-) David/quchen

Having seen the new GHC process, I am not quite sure how to relate it to Haskell'. Would someone who's thought more about this care to clarify the mapping between the different "roles", and concretely which parts are we thinking of doing for Haskell'? -Iavor

I kinda agree, the workflow they're articulating doesn't quite line up with
what we may do.
I can't speak for other folks, but I've been privately putting together /
chewing on a few proposals I want to put forward. But I also want to make
sure I adhere to a high bar/ think things through in what I put forward.
I do think a number of prime committee members are planning to meet during
Icfp. I hope to be amongst them :).
Also have been busy with work :)
On Wednesday, July 20, 2016, Iavor Diatchki
Having seen the new GHC process, I am not quite sure how to relate it to Haskell'. Would someone who's thought more about this care to clarify the mapping between the different "roles", and concretely which parts are we thinking of doing for Haskell'?
-Iavor

I'll be at Zurihac as well should you need input from the CLC side. Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, David Luposchainsky via Haskell-prime
wrote: On 19.07.2016 20:08, Michael Walker wrote: I haven't seen anything on this mailing list for a little while, is anything going on? Has the process by which proposals will be submitted and worked out been solidified yet?
I’m planning to spend some time at ZuriHac this weekend thinking about Haskell’, maybe getting the Report to build, making a few experimental changes. Oh, and talking to people mostly, so if you’re around... :-)
David/quchen _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
participants (7)
-
Carter Schonwald
-
David Luposchainsky
-
Edward Kmett
-
Iavor Diatchki
-
José Manuel Calderón Trilla
-
Michael Walker
-
Simon Peyton Jones