RE: Bang patterns, ~ patterns, and lazy let

7 Feb
2006
7 Feb
'06
5:37 p.m.
Applying the rules on the wiki, the first step is to translate the first expression into a tuple binding, omitting the implicit ~: Not so! I changed it a few days ago after talking to Ben, to a simpler form that works nicely for recursive bindings too. Darn - I forgot to change the rules at the bottom. Anyway, read the section "Let and where bindings". Sorry about the rules at the end. Simon
7046
Age (days ago)
7046
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Simon Peyton-Jones