since the content of this list is in general so completely beyond my feeble Haskell comprehension, I feel I must make a nuisance of myself with some inane criticism of the GHCi ASCII art ... !
% ghci ___ ___ _ / _ \ /\ /\/ __(_) / /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Inter[..], v[..] 5.04.2,
for H[..] 98.
/ /_\\/ __ / /___| | http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ \____/\/ /_/\____/|_| Type :? for help.
Aaaargh...
Surley there is an arty type out there who can improve on that illegible mess which is believe, supposed to be "GHCi" !
Don't blame us, blame Figlet (http://www.figlet.org/). Cheers, Simon
G'day all. On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:16:07PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Don't blame us, blame Figlet (http://www.figlet.org/).
On the contrary, I blame you guys for using Figlet. They're MY CPU cycles you're burning up there! Cheers, Andrew Bromage
participants (2)
-
Andrew J Bromage -
Simon Marlow