Re: Wish list: expanded defaulting, dependent types, reflection
30 Sep
2001
30 Sep
'01
1:45 a.m.
At 2001-09-29 09:11, Mike Gunter wrote:
There does not seem to be a way to do everything I'd like in GHC even in its most permissive mode (I'm using "-fallow-overlapping-instances -fallow-undecidable-instances".) In particular, I'd like to use bare integer literals together with values of the types I define.
Do you have a code example of what you're trying to do? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
9144
Age (days ago)
9144
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Ashley Yakeley