RE: Another question wrt hiding imports
See Section 4.4.2, after the table. Does that answer the qestion? Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: S. Alexander Jacobson [mailto:alex@shop.com] | Sent: 12 July 2001 15:03 | To: wlux@uni-muenster.de | Cc: haskell@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Another question wrt hiding imports | | | I asked this a while ago and never got an answer. Asking | again in better context: | | How do you control importing operator precedence? | | Suppose that you have: | f x = 2 + 2 * x | | And an imported module increases the precedence of (+). | You end up getting mangled. | | My assumption is that the only way to protect yourself from | this is to import qualified so A.+ has a different precedence from +. | | But I don't think the report promises this. The report just | promises that A.+ has the same precedence as (+) inside module A. | | -Alex- | | ___________________________________________________________________ | S. Alexander Jacobson Shop.Com | 1-646-638-2300 voice The Easiest Way To Shop (sm) | | | _______________________________________________ | Haskell mailing list | Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell |
participants (1)
-
Simon Peyton-Jones