Re: Polymorphic types without type constructors?
2 Feb
2005
2 Feb
'05
3:25 a.m.
Hi, Shin-Cheng Mu wrote:
exp2 = \m::N -> \n::N -> \f::(b -> b) -> \b::b -> n [b->b] (m[b]) f b
Oops.. it should be exp2 = \m::N -> \n::N -> \f::(b -> b) -> \b::b -> n [b] (m[b]) f b sincerely, Shin-Cheng Mu
7877
Age (days ago)
7877
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Shin-Cheng Mu