Re: RFC: Syntax for implicit parameter bindings
4 Feb
2002
4 Feb
'02
9:33 p.m.
At 2002-02-04 01:45, Koen Claessen wrote:
| addBase{?base=7} 5
I like this! It is the least polluting syntax of all.
Hmm... you have braces without following a keyword. I think in all other cases, braces follow a keyword (where, let, do, of). -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
4 Feb
4 Feb
9:58 p.m.
New subject: RFC: Syntax for implicit parameter bindings
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:33:54PM -0800, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
At 2002-02-04 01:45, Koen Claessen wrote:
| addBase{?base=7} 5
I like this! It is the least polluting syntax of all.
Hmm... you have braces without following a keyword. I think in all other cases, braces follow a keyword (where, let, do, of).
Field updates use braces which do not follow a keyword, with very similar syntax. I don't know about all the implications, but I do like the proposal. --Dylan
8972
Age (days ago)
8972
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Ashley Yakeley -
Dylan Thurston