Sounds great! I have some vague ideas about what the comparison might reveal -- but I expect to learn quite a bit in the process, and use that to improve reform. There is definitely room for more than one form validation library. They all have shortcomings, and I am hoping something even better will come along some day :) - jeremy On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Jasper Van der Jeugt <m@jaspervdj.be> wrote:

Congrats on the release!

I would like to help out with the full comparison since I have some knowledge and experience on the subject. Because of the different approach, I think there's definitely room for two libraries.

Cheers, Jasper

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Felipe Almeida Lessa <felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:

...

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Jeremy Shaw <jeremy@n-heptane.com> wrote:

...

I hope to do a full comparison of reform vs digestive-functors 0.3 vs yesod forms in a few weeks.

That would be awesome!  Just sayin' =).

Cheers,

-- Felipe.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HAppS" group. To post to this group, send email to happs@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to happs+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/happs?hl=en.

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe