George Russell <ger@tzi.de> writes:

I'm writing, but that shouldn't be too hard to tweak. In particular I have followed SML in using "." to express qualification by something, even though Haskell already used "." for something else, because I can't be bothered right now to dig up a better symbol.

This is why all non S-exp like lanaguage are doomed to progressive syntactic cancer as the useful parts of operator name space and syntax space become progressively polluted and mutated by one fad after another. -- Julian Assange |If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people |together to collect wood or assign them tasks proff@iq.org |and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless proff@gnu.ai.mit.edu |immensity of the sea. -- Antoine de Saint Exupery