Great stuff. However, David Waern's SoC project is very nearly at the point where he can generate Haddock for anything GHC understands; he's using GHC itself as the front end. He's recently added the rendering code for GADTs I think. I think he's probably planning a release shortly. David? Meanwhile Ashley's hack may well prove useful. Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: haskelldoc-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:haskelldoc-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Ashley | Yakeley | Sent: 07 February 2007 07:18 | To: haskelldoc@haskell.org | Subject: Haddock GADTs Hack | | Included is a hack to allow haddock to parse GADTs. There are two | problems with it: | | 1. I don't think you can add doc comments to the constructors. | | 2. The shown types are wrong: the whole type of the constructor is shown | as if it were the type of a single argument. Fixing this will presumably | involve adding another constructor to HsConDecl to represent GADT | constructors. | | It wouldn't be appropriate to release haddock in this state, but I think | it's helpful for those of us who could get no doc at all just because we | have a GADT in our code. | | -- | Ashley Yakeley | Seattle, WA