
to be honest, as much as i'd love contributing, i often don't have the time to go in and debug software that i'm trying/evaluating. (as i said, the patch was already applied in the tarball i downloaded.) such pursuits almost always turn into much deeper time sinks than how they're initially presented to me. when will the next version be available that fixes this? i'll wait for that. thanks. On 10/2/06, Malcolm Wallace Malcolm.Wallace-at-cs.york.ac.uk |hat| <...> wrote:
Thomas Davie
wrote: This seems to be a recurring problem. Do we have a list of what ghc produces on each platform? If we had that, I guess we could find a regexp that works on all known systems.
It's not so much ghc, as _gcc_, because the extra whitespace/#pragmas are inserted by the C preprocessor. I believe the regexp currently in CVS is correct (not "^#" and not "^$"), but perhaps an alternative which actually searches for numbers on a line of their own (e.g. "^[0-9]*$") might be better.
Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ Hat mailing list Hat@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hat