Andre W B Furtado wrote:
[...] I think the team would like to write the engine in C/C++. If it is not possible to do this AND call HOpenGL routines [...]
Hmmm, if the engine should be written in C/C++, I can't see a reason to use HOpenGL at all: Just use the ubiquitous C binding for OpenGL! The only further advice I can give then is to avoid hammering OpenGL into something OO, just use it imperatively within C++. It's a state machine of which you have only one instance of, so the potential for OO stuff is quite limited. The only thing I can imagine is using C++'s ad-hoc overloading to reduce the plethora of calls a bit. Note that I'm not against OO at all (after all, I'm using Java/C++ at work), but not everything fits nicely into a single paradigm. Cheers, S.