Re: [HOpenGL] EXT_framebuffer_object support.

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Balazs Komuves wrote:

I think we should have some testing and code review before trying to merge it with the official repository (there is a reason I did not publicised this before, though the FBO stuff is fairly new). For example I just discovered two (very minor) bugs by trying to generate Haddock documentation. The API isn't set into stone either; I hope it's reasonable enough, but some changes may be beneficial.

Hm. I certainly agree that testing and API review is required for release. However I'd prefer other developers to have easy access to these patches through a main development repository than not. If API stability is a concern with the main repository then I suggest having two repositories: One for development and another for stable use. Cheers, Corey

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Corey O'Connor wrote:

...

Excellent stuff! I like having the framebuffer texture functions check the status as well. That's a handy addition. So how do we get your patch into the mainline repo? I'd hate to have another person duplicate the same work again.

Cheers, Corey O'Connor