Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 14:23:24 schrieb Claude Heiland-Allen:
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Suggested fix:
diff attached.
I'm fine with the addition, just one minor notice: The package versioning policy (http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy) tells us that we must bump at least the minor version number of the GLUT package from 2.1.2.1 to 2.1.3.0. The PVP could even be interpreted in such a way that we must bump the major version number, i.e. use 2.2.0.0, but it is a bit unclear about what to do when only a new alternative is added to an already existing algebraic data type. On the one hand, a data type is changed, but on the other hand one basically simply introduces a new binding (the new constructor). I'm not sure what the consensus is in such a case. Your patch will be in the next GLUT release. Thanks, S.