24 May
2004
24 May
'04
4:24 a.m.
On 21 May 2004 18:11, Sven Panne wrote:
Glynn Clements wrote:
[...] If the library lists in package.conf are being used for both purposes (i.e. ld and dlopen()), they should probably processed in opposing directions for dlopen() vs ld.
This sounds like a cunning idea and should be easy to implement, :-) probably by reversing "dlls" in the following line of Linker.linkPackage:
... mapM_ (load_dyn dirs) dlls ...
SimonM?
Yes, that looks like the right thing to do. I'll make that change and see if anything breaks... Cheers, Simon