On 21 May 2004 18:11, Sven Panne wrote:

Glynn Clements wrote:

...

[...] If the library lists in package.conf are being used for both purposes (i.e. ld and dlopen()), they should probably processed in opposing directions for dlopen() vs ld.

This sounds like a cunning idea and should be easy to implement, :-) probably by reversing "dlls" in the following line of Linker.linkPackage:

... mapM_ (load_dyn dirs) dlls ...

SimonM?

Yes, that looks like the right thing to do. I'll make that change and see if anything breaks... Cheers, Simon