[Hugs-users] Excerpt from "Yet another Haskell Tutorial"

Hello, (and sorry for the preceding accidental empty message), I'd like to ask a question concerning a following passage in "Yet another Haskell Tutorial" that ushers in the topic of monads: <> How do I have to interpret this? I cannot make sense of it for I do not see where the definition of a function that I know is violated. I view it that way: The string is just a kind of argument to the string-reading function and that different strings (i.e. different arguments) yield different return values is a commonplace phenomenon with functions, isn't it? How do I have to alter this (over?)simple interpretation to see the point the author wants to make? Thank you very much in advance. Christian -- Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*. Nur noch kurze Zeit! "Feel free" mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl