12 Mar
2003
12 Mar
'03
4:39 p.m.
Ross Paterson wrote:
I've had a look, and it's not so hard to do what I suggested, but the changes would be cleaner if the search strategy for module names, currently [...] i.e. swap the first two generators. [...] Any views?
Looks fine to me. Note that in my opinion the extra directory should only be added, if the import or load really contained a path with slashes, not if it is a pure hierarchical module name. I suppose it is sensible for Hugs to accept names such as A/B/C.D.E but it currently also accepts names such as A.B.C/D/E, which I think it should not. Olaf -- OLAF CHITIL, Dept. of Computer Science, The University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK. URL: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~olaf/ Tel: +44 1904 434756; Fax: +44 1904 432767