Just out of the blue.... How hard would it be to port hslibs/posix to hugs? IMHO it would be really nice to have it available in hugs under unix. Jens
How hard would it be to port hslibs/posix to hugs? IMHO it would be really nice to have it available in hugs under unix.
agreed. but meanwhile, how about using ghci? joe@isun11:~/projekte/trs-games/cgi$ ghci-5.00.2 -package posix ___ ___ _ / _ \ /\ /\/ __(_) / /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive, version 5.00.2, For Haskell 98. / /_\\/ __ / /___| | http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ \____/\/ /_/\____/|_| Type :? for help. Loading package std ... linking ... done. Loading package lang ... linking ... done. Loading package posix ... linking ... done. Prelude> Posix.getWorkingDirectory >>= print "/home/joe/projekte/trs-games/cgi" -- -- Johannes Waldmann ---- http://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~joe/ -- -- joe@informatik.uni-leipzig.de -- phone/fax (+49) 341 9732 204/252 --
Johannes Waldmann
How hard would it be to port hslibs/posix to hugs? IMHO it would be really nice to have it available in hugs under unix.
agreed. but meanwhile, how about using ghci?
I know about ghci and I like using it for testing programs. But, correct me if I'm wrong, as far as I know ghci doesn't support executable scripts, like runhugs does? For "scripting" isn't hugs still the way to go? Jens
participants (2)
-
Jens Petersen -
Johannes Waldmann