Re: [jhc] JHC benchmark.

On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:54PM +0200, Lemmih wrote:

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:32 AM, John Meacham wrote:

...

Hmm.. looks like many are failing due to the unpacked poly bug, as shown by regression test 'tests.bugs.UnpackedPoly'. Combined with the newtype unpacking bug pointed out by droundy earlier, I think it is time for me to take a look at unpacked fields.

x2n1 is quite interesting. It generated the wrong answer with the GC enabled but works fine without it.

Yes, I think I am pushing the boehm GC further than it was designed for at times :) My recent patches sent to the list fix a few bugs that were keeping some of the benchmarks from compiling. John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/