Hi all.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, John Meacham
I moved to YAML because trying to parse cabal files was always just a hack, it wasn't real support for cabal files because that can't easily be done, it just confused things to try so didn't and went with a standard format at the same time.
Okay. I understand the background jhc and Cabal. By the way, which style fits jhc in future? 1. Jhc includes all YAML files supported. (= current jhc's style) 2. Split jhc repo and YAML files repo. And YAML file repo welcomes user's pull request. (on github? or darcs?) 3. Jhc has only YAML files for base packages. New web service provides YAML file. The sources are gotten from Hackage DB. New web service is wrapper for Hackage DB. If we choose 2 or 3 style, I think YAML file format needs have build-depend section. I want to aim at jhc/Ajhc should be. Thank's for your time, -- Kiwamu Okabe