Argh. Not another color for the bikeshed. We were so close to a nice
universal consensus given your +1 on the thread. =)
Let's end this and just go with Simon's Solo# as it had already achieved a
reasonably wide consensus on the thread and we can put this to bed.
Simon: I'd replied a couple of weeks ago on the trac ticket to try to end
this, but apparently didn't visibly weigh in in a fashion that obviously
carried the full force of the committee.
-Edward
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Andrew Martin
My vote is for Single/Single#.
Also, in case there is any confusion around this, I was not a member of the CLC when this issue was originally raised, but the committee has accepted me since then.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Simon Peyton Jones via Libraries < libraries@haskell.org> wrote:
Dear Libraries Committee
Some time ago Andrew Martin asked you https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2018-January/028419.html what the name of the unary unboxed one-tuple type and data constructor should be. The thread ran for a while, but you never came to a conclusion.
Can we nail this one? You’ll see on Trac #14673 https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/14673#comment:19 that chessai wants me to decide 😊. But it should really be you.
To me, there seems to be something of a consensus around Solo#.
Simon
PS: actually I think Andrew may have addressed libraries@ rather than core-libraries-committee@ by mistake.
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- -Andrew Thaddeus Martin
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "haskell-core-libraries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to haskell-core-libraries+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.