
David Menendez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Felipe Lessa
wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:14:22PM -0400, David Menendez wrote:
Aside from assertions that this is a bad thing because you say so, what evidence do we have that this is a problem? The wiki mentions the problem with forgetting the results of an operation.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. That page is written almost entirely by Henning Thielemann, but because it's on the official Haskell wiki, it seems authoritative.
It's a wiki, I think it should document problems even if not everyone agrees about them; I think it's our tradition to scatter pages with conflicting viewpoints around our wiki (and even cross-link them to each other). Please don't think things on the haskell-wiki are authoritative; I think they're there so that there is the potential to collaborate on them. That page even has links to some other people expressing the same frustrations. Feel free to update it sympathetically if we've discussed something here that would strengthen it as a page (and/or, is there a "do notation considered helpful" page?). Maybe something about "ignore" would strengthen it?; I'm not sure; or references to stronger languages like Agda where "forgetting" is a more crucial concept. -Isaac