Re: Proposal: Add Chris Done's "om" combinator to Control.Monad

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:37 PM, John Wiegley wrote:

It's just that I tend to write the following a LOT:

x <- someMonadicFunction when x $ do

Sure, this is a common pattern. But the name is terrible, and it's not clear to me that the functionality is a useful generalization. Why not advocate for whenM instead? whenM :: Monad m => m Bool -> m () -> m ()