19 Nov
2009
19 Nov
'09
6:52 a.m.
Hello Simon, Thursday, November 19, 2009, 2:36:12 PM, you wrote:
The main question still to be resolved is what names to use. I agree with Duncan's point that deepseq should have the same type as seq, to reduce confusion. So then what shall we call the a -> () version?
not that i vote for it, just idea: deepseq_ like monadic *_ functions -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com