On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:16 -0800, Thomas DuBuisson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 12:55 +0000, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 01:53 -0800, Thomas DuBuisson wrote:
All,
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3058 There are a number of other functions from the Numeric module we should also consider. These are all the ones that return ShowS, the equivalent of the Doc type.
I've added another patch to that ticket for consideration. It has hex, oct, intAtBase (plus padded variants). Also included are {e,f,g}float without any padding options.
Padding floats could be touchy - perhaps it should be a separate patch by someone who would use such a feature and know what they want.
Thoughts?
Presumably it would be uncontroversial for the float ones to behave the same as the ones from the existing Numeric module. Duncan