18 Sep
2013
18 Sep
'13
5:24 a.m.
On 2013-09-18 at 09:22:07 +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote: [...]
So: +1 from me on including aeson as-is, and if Bryan's interested in making this change to aeson, I'd consider it a perk.
+1 like Micheal (i.e. I support `aeson` in HP unconditionally; but I'd be delighted if the `ByteString` instances not pure issue would be fixed somehow)