Hi Bulat On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 15:08 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
but why you provide ByteString-only API?? i think that more common idiom is to provide String functions here and use somewhat like Network.ByteString, Network.ByteString.Lazy modules to provide ByteString/ByteStringLazy equivalents of String function from Network.hs
Mostly because I wanted ByteStrings so that's what I implemented :) Good point though. I've uploaded a replacement patch changing the Network functions to use String and adding Network.ByteString and Network.ByteString.Lazy. Thanks for the suggestion. Ideally it'd be nice if this all used some sort of String typeclass interface. But this should do for now. -- Robert Marlow MITS Co-operative Limited http://www.mits.coop/