
On 05/20/2013 10:41 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
could you elaborate on the other useful generalizations please? :-)
Sorry, I meant to say in my last e-mail that `mapM` would be analogous to `fmap` when using the `pipes`-based `ListT`, not `lift`.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Gabriel Gonzalez
mailto:gabriel439@gmail.com> wrote: I want to apologize to wren (and everybody else). I was tired and overreacted when the discussion started veering into making more breaking changes.
I don't mind the Foldable changes too much. My main concerns are:
* loss of monomorphism makes teaching more difficult * They can be generalized in other useful ways
However, I don't consider those concerns show-stoppers.
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org mailto:Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries