
22 May
2010
22 May
'10
5:01 a.m.
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 14:54 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Hi Ashley (and other people interested in the time lib),
I wonder if we could look more closely at the in-memory representations of the data types in the time library to see if we could make them a bit smaller.
These are breaking changes. If we do them, we should bump the major version to 2. And this might open the door to other breaking changes... What should replace the Pico type? Is it worth generalising Fixed (in base) to allow any underlying integer type (also a breaking change)? -- Ashley Yakeley