I'm not sure I would label it a bad decision, but the concerns here make sense. On Mon, Nov 12, 2018, 5:16 AM Jon Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
Daniel Cartwright <chessai1996@gmail.com> writes:
ANum seems to be just Data.Monoid.Ap. Also, I can see not wanting to worsen the error messages, though it is worth pointing out that we already have a Monoid instance with the same semantics, and a similar potential for confusing error messages.
The existence of a previous bad decision doesn’t seem to me to be a good reason to make another one.
-- Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk http://www.chaos.org.uk/~jf/Stuff-I-dont-want.html (updated 2014-04-05)
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries